Evaluation of Evidence-Based Practices in Online Learning: A Meta-Analysis and Review of Online Learning Studies, the Department of Education reported that “on average, students in online learning conditions performed better than those receiving face-to-face instruction.” " /> Online vs. Face-to-Face Throwdown: Good Teaching Transcends Course Format - Faculty Focus | Faculty Focus
October 11, 2010

Online vs. Face-to-Face Throwdown: Good Teaching Transcends Course Format

By: in Online Education

Add Comment

In the 2009 report, Evaluation of Evidence-Based Practices in Online Learning: A Meta-Analysis and Review of Online Learning Studies, the Department of Education reported that “on average, students in online learning conditions performed better than those receiving face-to-face instruction.”

While this was a welcome validation for proponents of online learning, the report cautioned “that interpretations of this result, however, should take into consideration the fact that online and face-to-face conditions generally differed on multiple dimensions, including the amount of time that learners spent on task.”

In some ways, because online learning often carries greater expectations and opportunities for interacting with course material and fellow students, an increase in time on task is a natural benefit.

“It’s a tough sell sometimes for teachers to convince students that they need to do more on their own, and I think one of the advantages of online education is that students feel that they have more of an investment [when learning] online and they don’t have you as that learning crutch,” says Ike Shibley PhD, associate professor of chemistry at Penn State Berks.

In the recent online video seminar, Teaching Online vs. F2F: 15 Differences That Affect Learning, Shibley talked about how the online classroom differs from the traditional face-to-face classroom, and suggested strategies for capitalizing on those differences to improve student learning.

Some of the 15 differences he discussed involve:

  1. The nature of student collaboration
  2. The use of writing
  3. Student interaction with content
  4. The value of structure
  5. The need for immediate feedback
  6. The dependence on other professionals
  7. The ease of assessment
  8. The necessity of learning objects

And yet, despite the differences between online teaching and face-to-face teaching, Shibley says the two have a lot more in common than originally believed because, in the end, effective teaching transcends course format.

“Some of the differences are advantages. Some of the differences are disadvantages. But I think they’re differences in degree not in kind,” he says.

email
Start your free subscription to Faculty Focus!
Sign up today and get articles like this one delivered right to your inbox.
Add Comment

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,


Comments

sammy | April 30, 2014

online schooling is horrible i would not take schooling on line its hard to get motivated

rachel | April 30, 2014

i do indeed agree with you does any one else ?!?

Tabitha | December 23, 2014

I think the online student has an advantage over the traditional student due to the enormous amount of resources at the finger tip ; I do feel that a student who does not comprehend well will face a difficult time completing the assignments , following course instructions and the personal touch that face to face offers.


Trackbacks

  1. To credit or not to credit…that is the question. | Hall's Hype
  2. New Choices in Board Member Training « Excellence in Governance and School Leadership
  3. Catherine's Reflections » Blog Archive » Week 6: Is Teaching Online Really Different than Teaching Face to Face?
  4. Society of Illustrators 2010 Educators Symposium | ILU Graduate Student Gallery Blog

Add a Comment

Logged in as . Logout »