March 5, 2012

Getting Students to Act on Our Feedback

By: in Teaching Professor Blog

Add Comment

I’m still pondering why students don’t make better use of the feedback we provide on papers, projects, presentations, even the whole class feedback we offer after we’ve graded a set of exams. Yes, we do see improvement as we look back across a course, but we also see a lot of the same errors repeated throughout the course.

Just today I found a reference to a 2007 study (Crisp) where a cohort of undergraduate social work students got detailed feedback on a writing assignment. Six weeks later they did a second, very similar assignment and 66.7% of their grades were within four percentage points of the grade received on the first assignment. This and other analyses caused the researcher to conclude, “this study found only limited support for the idea that students respond to feedback by making changes which are consistent with the intent of the feedback received.” (p. 571)

It takes a lot of time and effort to provide students with good feedback. Most faculty I know tackle the task seriously and conscientiously. We should be getting a better return on our investment. You’d think as grade-oriented as students are, they would want to do better on subsequent assignments, and would use the teacher feedback to help them accomplish that goal.

Another article I was reading hinted at what might be part of the problem. The feedback we offer students tends to be focused on justifying the grade. It defends the decision to award the paper a B and not an A-. That feedback is appropriate but it doesn’t highlight what the student needs to do to improve. “If assessment feedback is to be effective in guiding learning, it should focus on growth rather than grading encouraging and advancing student learning,” write Rae and Cochrane (p. 217). I have to admit, I don’t think I ever gave much thought to the focus of my feedback. I know I identified problems, but did I indicate how they could be fixed or did I assume that would be obvious to the students? I’m thinking it might be useful to take a set of graded papers or essay answers and do an analysis of the comments. As always, colleagues can be especially helpful in getting us to see things that might not be all that apparent to us.

Feedforward is another interesting way to think about the feedback offered students. This more future-oriented feedback responds to what the student did, but in light of what needs to be done on the next assignment. Rather than isolated comments, it distills the feedback into three or four specific suggestions that target what the student should work on to improve the next assignment.

I continue to worry that we have so long left students out of the evaluation process that they are truly bereft of self-assessment skills. They don’t recognize what’s good about work they’ve completed and they don’t see the problems. I know, some of them don’t care, but those students aside, we need to think of ways to help students gain what Sadler calls “appraisal expertise.” Teachers have it; gained through years of practice. We have graded more pieces of student work than most of us can count.

Perhaps students would make better use of our feedback if they used that feedback to develop an action plan for the next assignment. “Based on the teacher’s feedback and my own assessment of this work, here’s the three things I plan to improve in the next assignment.” Maybe students don’t get the grade for the first assignment until the action plan has been submitted. And maybe that action plan then gets submitted along with the next assignment. I’m exploring options here. Please be welcome to share your insights and ideas for getting students to read our feedback, but more importantly, to act on it.

References: Crisp, B. R. (2007). Is it worth the effort? How feedback influences students’ subsequent submission of accessible work? Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 32 (5), 571-581.

Rae, A. M. and Cochrane, D. K. (2008). Listening to students: How to make written assessment feedback useful. Active Learning in Higher Education, 9 (3), 217-230.

Sadler, D. R. (2010). Beyond feedback: Developing student capability in complex appraisal. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35 (5), 535-550.

email
Add Comment

Tags: , , , ,


Comments

Linsey Taylor | March 5, 2012

For the last few years I have been offering 10% on the second piece of coursework for – submmitting a copy of the CW1 feedback sheet – and a comment on how they used it to improve their current assignment . It certainly means that they collect their feedback sheets, which is already a start! 95% of students do make some attempt to address issues, even if not very successfully.

Tanya | March 5, 2012

I use a portfolio system, so everything about my feedback and the student’s work is focused on progress. For each piece of writing I have the student submit the answers to a set of questions that ask them to identify strengths and weaknesses in the piece, what challenges the piece posed and if and how they overcame them, and how they addressed weaknesses from their last piece based on my feedback. I focus on commenting on their responses to these questions, identifying points of agreement and discrepancies between my response to the piece and their own. These memos create a dialogue between the student and me that carries over into their next assignment so that at the end of the course, we have had a pretty extensive conversation about their writing and a record of their progress as a writer. The students use this dialogue to create their writing portfolio, focusing on addressing both their performances and their progress. I have found this system to be extraordinarily useful in teaching students to both assess their own writing and apply my feedback.

Shari C | March 7, 2012

Maryellen,
I really like your reference to "feedforward". Sometimes I think that we as instructors provide the feedback and expect students to take the information and run with it. That does not always happen. I believe that "feedforward" can be a mindset that we should have as we lead, advise and coach our students. A transfer of learning is what we are looking for and having this mindset will help that happen. As always, thanks for sharing your insight!

Laurie Seier | March 9, 2012

I sit down with my students and take a few minutes to review the corrections. I find this to be really effective as opposed to just returning corrected assignments. I also emphasize quality in their assignments. I look for them to be on an upward trajectory so I like to look at improvement over time instead of individual assignments.

Barbara | March 9, 2012

Maryellen,
This was a great article,
I especially liked your idea of having the student's submit an action plan for their next assignment. This would not only have them focus on the feedback, but we would know if they understood it enough to use it. I am a fairly new teacher, but I have learned that sometimes feedback which I have given and believed to be very clear, was not always as clear to the student as I had anticipated.

Kimberly | March 11, 2012

This is a very good article and I also like the action plan. I cannot tell you how much time I spend marking up papers and giving constructive feedback with links back to our writing center and/or example on how to improve mistakes in APA, grammar, etc only to see the same mistakes recur. I think I'm going to make it worth 1 pt in my next online course to submit an action plan back to me on feedback. When you make something worth earning points, even miniscule points, students tend to sit up and take notice.

Kerri | August 3, 2014

Hi Kimberly
I like your idea of submitting an action plan (from a previous reply) with the feedback. I too am new to tutoring and I'm noticing if I ask for a reply it is not forthcoming. We already have a participation mark for work submitted.
All the best


Trackbacks

  1. wwnorm » Online Classroom Management notes – #potcert11 » wwnorm
  2. Around the Web: Now You’re Speaking My Language « the Bok Blog
  3. SMALL GROUPS, LARGE CLASS SERIES (PART III) | CTLE Wordpress
  4. Mistakes and Feedforward | Koehler Center for Teaching Excellence
  5. Critique of Grant Wiggins’ “Seven Keys to Effective Feedback” | royceoneale


website security