December 11, 2008

Silent Participators

By: in Teaching and Learning, Teaching Professor Blog

Add Comment

Do students have the right to remain silent in class? I continue to struggle with that question. It definitely depends on the course. If you want to learn French, you really can’t do that without speaking. But what about history or environmental biology?

I was interested to read a qualitative research article that analyzes interviews with four students in a problem-based learning (PBL) course who mostly remained silent in their small groups. The article opens with observations about how participation is becoming expected of students and how it functions as an integral part of approaches like PBL. Student who don’t participate are seen as problematic. The practitioner literature is full of strategies and approaches teachers can use to facilitate participation, be it in small groups or the larger class. The authors raise a note of caution: “We need to establish if silence denotes failure to learn or simply another way of learning in the dialogic classroom.”

They make several valid points. First, if the pressure to participate is strong, students may be focused on the need to contribute at the expense of coming to grips with the material. That kind of pressure generates talk for the sake of talk. They also point out that verbally confident students may participate a lot and be rewarded for doing so, but they may be making contributions minus any new learning. They may be contributing what they already know or repeating the comments made by others. Most importantly, interviews with the four silent students caused the authors to distinguish even more sharply between talk and learning. Conversations with the four interviewees revealed that each of them had learned a lot in the discussions which they “participated” in silently.

The authors challenge teachers to carefully consider goals. Is the point of a PBL experience (or some other group activity) to develop verbal communication skills or is it to develop a new and deeper understanding of course content? The answer might be both, but even if it is, instructors need to be sure that they are not favoring the participation objective over the mastery of material goal.

Work like this reminds us that active, engaged listeners play an important role in every group. Students struggling to express course concepts, to use the language of the discipline, to answer challenging questions are helped when someone in the group is listening and supporting their attempts to articulate new ideas. Perhaps our definitions of participation need to be enlarged so that those who participate silently get credit for helping to make the group a place that encourages everyone, including them, to share thoughts, ideas, questions, and reactions.

Reference: Remedios, L., Clarke, D., and Hawthorne, L. (2008). The silent participant in small group collaborative learning contexts. Active Learning in Higher Education, 9 (3), 201-216.

—Maryellen Weimer

email
Add Comment


Comments

Derek | December 12, 2008

In Richard Felder's work on learning styles, he notes that some students learn best through active engagement while others through quiet reflection. He notes that the traditional lecture format doesn't support either learner, since students aren't given opportunities to engage with their peers or to take the time they need to reflect. More active approaches like problem-based learning certainly help those students who learn best by active engagement. The work you describe here on silent participants is an important reminder that reflective learners should be considered when designing learning experiences.

JKG | January 4, 2009

I completely agree with the last sentence of your post, "Perhaps our definitions of participation need to be enlarged so that those who participate silently get credit…" I have always been, and still am a quiet PARTICIPANT. Although I am not the most vocal member of a group, I feel I am a strong and encouraging listener. I can relate to the post's description of how quiet students may feel when verbal participation becomes a requirement.It is true to say that the focus does shift from actually learning information to preparing what to say. I enjoy working in pairs or groups of three. There is less pressure, but with so few group members participation is needed.


Trackbacks

  1. There are no trackbacks to this post yet.

Add a Comment

Logged in as . Logout »


website security